this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
350 points (99.2% liked)

Hacker News

5043 readers
519 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If I go into my garden now, and pull up all the weeds, the garden will look good for a bit, and the nutrients they were stealing from other plants will be spread out amongst the remaining plants.

However, there are likely some smaller weeds just under the surface, so within a few weeks, there'll be some weeds again, and they'll begin taking nutrition away from all the other plants. A year from now, there'll be just as many weeds as before, and they'll have strangled and starved many of the other plants in the garden.

It's generally accepted that there's two ways to deal with such weeds.

  1. Regular maintenance. You need to cull all the weeds, every week, to keep on top of them. Eventually this will weaken the roots, rhizomes and seeds and then there'll be fewer weeds. Over time there'll be fewer weeds to remove each week, but you must never stop maintaining, or else they'll take over as before.

  2. Preventative measures. Look at the circumstances that cause weeds to form, and make structural changes to stop this. This may include things such as ground-cover plants, which protect the soil from weed growth, but store and then distribute their nutrients back into the soil. It can also include things like organising, supporting and strengthening your other plants, using things such as companion planting (where two plants take and release opposing nutrients, both working together and feeding each other to become stronger). When the garden is unified and stronger and working harmoniously, there are fewer opportunities for weeds to thrive.

It's best to take both approaches simultaneously.

Oh, sorry, I accidentally posted this gardening tip in a comment about billionaires!

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we could also create a pesticide that kills all the weeds and gives everyone celiac disease and cancer

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

In the metaphor, this is pollution and microplastics.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The oxalis in my garden bed is getting out of control even though pull it.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Depending on the specifics type, you can normally eat it, which might help get rid of it quicker?

p.s. Do not eat billionaires.

[–] wanderinglurk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This could be coopted by others to deal with species of plants that gets labelled as weed too.

Mint, dandelion, thistle, etc.

So, uh, I'd be careful with that.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Any given population is approximately 30% highly authoritarian. Their behaviors can be summarized as:

  1. high degree of submission to established, legitimate authorities in their society
  2. high levels of aggression in the name of said authorities
  3. a high level of conventionalism Often, a high authoritarian individual can be identified with the following question: To what degree should society be dictated by authority? Low and medium authoritarian people will both answer "not at all", while highly authoritarian people will say something like "an average amount". This illustrates the need to be normal in their lives. The need to see oneself as average.

So, one of the most effective ways to prevent this is for highly authoritarian people to see others acting in defiance of authority, as well as interacting with other, non-authoritarian people. Basically showing that continuous submission to authority is not the only way to live a normal life.

https://theauthoritarians.org/