this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
148 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85645 readers
3528 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 3 hours ago (4 children)
[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but now you can blame the AI. Sorry, not our fault.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

how does the logic work so it's not their fault? if they are price fixing they are price fixing, the mechanism doesn't matter.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yep, if you tell an AI to do something, you are at least partially to blame for whatever it does. They shouldn't be able to avoid responsibility that easily.

That's kind if what Germany told Google. "If you have AI write your search summaries, you are responsible for checking its work and liable for its mistakes.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 19 minutes ago

No, you are entirely to blame.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah you're probably on the money there. AI gives you some sort of plausible deniability?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

It didn't work for the RealPage rent price-fixing lawsuit.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

It certainly is. They get caught once in a while. The first time it happened was when I added the term "oligopoly" to my vocabulary.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

Tell that to OPEC.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is it illegal if they don't collude?

The but that makes using AI illegal is if they all use a common platform/service.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's legal if they don't do any communication between the companies. Then nobody can prove that there is collusion. Using AI, that all use the same way to raise the prices and vibe the prices higher as response to the other AI raising prices is even better. Then it's not even any human intent.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Landlords used a common platform to price fix without communication between the companies and that was ruled illegal, it's not quite the same but because of the way public LLMs don't isolate inputs from users, you could argue that if any 2 users input their prices into the same platform they are engaging in collision as the information isn't public.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches-proposed-settlement-greystar-largest-us-landlord-end-its

Really we should just ban all algorithmic price setting.