this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
197 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

85695 readers
3875 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 58 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Whose decision was it to charge 70-80 usd for a game?

Whose ai investments are buying up all the ram, gpus, and ssds?

Not consumers’…

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 8 minutes ago

And don't forget, everything is digital now, so that $80 game that you've completed in 2 weeks can't be traded for any secondary value.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago

Seriously. These CEOs need to get their heads out of their asses and open their eyes. My gaming PC is from 2019. My newest machine is lower power than that. A steam deck. And they've ruined the steam machine pricing too.

AAA games cost a lot, use basically all the same formulas from the past decade or two, and are expensive to make. They need to target less lofty graphics if they want to sell more copies. Less and less can afford bleeding edge hardware. Now is the time to double down in quality instead of fancy graphics. And this is why they're losing and indies are thriving.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Still a screamin deal as far as $ per hour of entertainment.

Adjusted for inflation, I paid ~$125.00 CAD for The Legend of Zelda when it launched on NES... For an 8 hr game...

The scale and quality of content delivered today is LIGHT YEARS ahead, and frankly, still the best value proposition in any entertainment media.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

That fails to take into account the fact that the gaming was a niche hobby that wasn't particularly accessible in part due to prices. Given the far far larger market for games and the greater competition for gamer attention you would expect prices to come down.

Prices are set base on what the market is believed to be able to bare however so value per hr or cost to develop are somewhat incidental to the monetisation of a game.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Prices for games have stayed constant for 35 years. Can you think of anything else that has stayed the same price in that time frame?

[–] relativelyrobin@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

For real. Nintendo 64 was not a niche hobby, and the games were still 70 to 80 bucks. That’s like $160 in today dollars. It shows, too. We got all this technology, but the care, polish, attention just isn’t there.

[–] TimothyOilypants@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

That's sort of my point... Prices are WAY down. Lower than they have EVER been. $125 for an 8 hr. game. What would that cost today?