this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
806 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

85779 readers
3724 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well considering my vehicle was the rental for the dealership and so I got an amazing deal on it because I was doing work at the dealership on the computer systems and they gave me a massive discount as an employee. I'm pretty damn happy with it. I also have taken it off-road and it does actually perform pretty well off-road as well. My Tacoma does much better of course because the Tacoma is a purpose-built vehicle. But that doesn't mean that my RAV4 is anything short of that. Also with it being a commuter car I don't mind that because the purpose of that is to take the load off of my truck that I use daily for work. There's no way in hell that I could or whatever own one of the old RAV4s. Just because there are thousands of people that own the RAV4s and like them. Doesn't mean that there aren't thousands more that absolutely love their current RAV4s. So pretty much your argument is null and void when it comes to that. I personally have driven in and driven those older RAV4s and I think their pieces of shit and I would never personally own one. And yes that's my antidote to levidence. But I'm also the one that would be looking at them as well. So it doesn't matter what your opinion is in this case for me. Those older RAV4s also aren't super great off-roaders as well. They had way underpowered engines they couldn't really go many places because their tires were too small to make much of a clearance. Those were essentially old Corollas that were lifted as well. If you've ever ridden in an older curl as well. So you're antidote to evidence about the new RAV4 simply being a lifted Corolla doesn't make much sense either.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Tire size has little to do with actual clearance. You should really go check the stats some time. Comparing the 2000 to the 2025, the 2025 gains ~1" of ground clearance and less than 1" of tire diameter. 701mm vs 724mm. You're seeing bigger rims, not bigger tires. So the 2025 pits the body just 1/2" higher from the axle than the 2000.

You're comparing a new vehicle's modern features and design elements, features and elements found across the Toyota and national market, and thinking the new vehicle is simply better than the old one.

Yes, I literally said the old ones were essentially lifted corollas. The part you skimmed over was that the current RAV is now closer to the Camry, including bumping up to the Camry platform.

This entire thread is about the bloat of vehicles. You have touched upo so many unrelated tangents. They bloated an economy trucklet into a an offroad cosplayer to skirt government regulations. That is the whole point. The 8.1" minimum ground clearance and steep approach/departure angles and AWD get it to class as an offroad vehicle while increasing risk of pedestrian death due to blunt frontal shape.

Nobody said the new RAV is a bad car.

There is a whole planet of cars outside your dealership.