this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
21 points (69.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48658 readers
722 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I posted a similar topic early today but worded it wrong that was my mistake. I'm genuinely curious how people have reached to this point and what they hope to achieve after. I understand getting rid of AI/LLM is the obvious one. What do you think we should do to get to that goal or your personal goal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do me a favour. Go look up the energy use per person for me in Germany, Spain, or the UK. Then go look up the energy usage per person in the USA or Canada and tell me again how necessary it is that transport, food, and heating are required energy use at the levels that currently happen in North America. You can repeat that same look from the "good" countries I listed to even lower use areas like Lithuania who still manage to heat and feed themselves on even less.

The way we live here is wasteful beyond belief, and the total value of that waste makes global AI energy usage look like a rounding error on one of the decimal points.

I'll even make it easy for you by giving you a link to a page that has these values. https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption

[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are still arguing a moot point.

Could and should we, in the western world, be more sustainable? Absolutely yes!

But do you think, that even MORE energy consumption for something as useless and flawed as current AI systems are is in any way justified?

Even if it is just a blip on the radar compared to energy that is used to survive, it is still more load that comes on top of current usage.

How much sense would it make to undertake efforts to reduce the energy that is used to live while at the same time using more energy to power data centers that mostly benefit some guys who bet on the usefullness of AI, even against common sense?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if it is just a blip on the radar compared to energy that is used to survive, it is still more load that comes on top of current usage

You aren't allowed to be this upset about AI power usage while at the same time almost completely accepting the individual choices you're making to waste 100s of times more power. There's a term for this, Hypocrite.

The scales you're suggesting are just not even close to each other. We could build 10x more AI datacenters, and we (the population of the world) would still end up saving significantly more energy by eating meat one fewer day per week and eating vegetarian that day instead. I'm not even kidding.

The things we could do by adjusting our diets, choosing more appropriate housing sizes, cohabitating more, walking, biking, public transit. Individually every single one of those dwarfs the amount of energy used by AI by orders of magnitude.

It's the equivalent of yelling at your kid for leaving the LED bulb on in their bedroom all day, when you drove them to school and picked them up and it's only a mile away. One driving trip, one day, uses more energy than that bulb does if left on all year.

[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I am not 'allowed to be upset'? Lol, ok. Sounds like you see youself as some sort of moral police.

Call me a hypocrite if it makes you feel better but you are just skirting my point that the energy usage of AI is something that is unnecessary, just like the glowing LED lightbulb in your empty kitchen.

This makes you come across as either daft, or as someone who argues in bad faith.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ever heard the saying "Penny Shy and Pound Foolish"

It's literally what you're doing right now.

[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I did, but please, enlighten me on the foolishness that you see here.

As I did write, I do agree that we as a species need to be more sustainable. But please give me one reason why wasting even more energy on AI is in any way shape or form benefitial.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

You are trying to pinch a penny (reduce the power usage for something absolutely tiny) while ignoring your own choices that cause much larger wastes (large detached houses, car culture, meat heavy diets)

If you can't understand how that's a problem, your education has failed you.