this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
358 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

85779 readers
3659 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derAbsender@piefed.social 94 points 1 day ago (27 children)

I Just dont understand why everyone seemingly make EVs ugly on purpose...

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's two big reasons.

No front grill

So much of a brand's identity can be carried by the grill and headlights. And on an EV, there's no need for a grill. But just a slab of flat metal looks weird, so they add stuff to break it up.

Drag

The range of an EV is a lot more sensitive to drag than an ICE car.

So in order to reduce the drag, shapes are smoothed out.

Aero efficiency becomes a much bigger priority than looks.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

The front grill isn't a problem for Ferrari design language. The 296 "grill" is mostly the haunches. An electric 296 would just flatten that out.

Similar story on drag, once you get rid of the mid engine air intake, drag would probably be within respectable drag for EV.

Questions would be about if they want a lot of battery range. This would screw up weight and ride height.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)