Selfhosted

60177 readers

837 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Vulnerabilities on Dockerhub (lemmy.ml)

submitted 22 hours ago by _Nemo_@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apologies if this is a rookie question, but I keep wondering what the vulnerabilities section on DockerHub is trying to tell me. Take nextcloud images for instance: The most current images seem to list 3 critical and 22 severe vulnerabilities. Does that mean those vulns are part of the image? If so, why would anyone want to run this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 20 hours ago

I don't know if I agree. I get it, but it's kind of important that people know that if they do something weird with a piece of software, that it might expose them to remote code execution or root shell exploits. It certainly does make you numb to the word "critical", but I don't have a solution to that.