this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
1358 points (99.3% liked)

memes

21720 readers
3024 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

No arguments? A pity.

it seems it wasn't me who didn't read your own source:

"Every federal government since this time has investigated the feasibility of constructing high-speed rail with speeds above 200 km/h, but to date nothing has ever gone beyond the detailed planning stage"

Even the US has come further already than that.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You’re confused why it’s not getting past the planning stage?

Maybe watch the video again? You’re literally the guy in it :)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8av3knflbQo

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yeah, thanks for confirming my argument. The video is pretty much bringing up the arguments I'd expect. But it really shows how weak they are when they complain about distances being too far when they are actually perfect for HSR and yes, it is enough if individual relations are close enough. That is how many HSR networks work.

But sure, Australia is the only country with mountains and suburbs. And kanguruhs are an unsurmountable issues for rail, but not for highways.

It all boils down to ideology. Weirdly enough it was not impossible to build inner urban highways though, which required much more space. But then, unlike road infrastructure, rail is required to be proftibale and that is why Australia remains underdeveloped and its airports overloaded.

Add to that wavering back and forth with financial support a generally hostile legal environment towards HSR projects and generally hostile laws to building important large national infrastructure, balooning costs on any infrastructure project. I would not be surprised if more money would have to be spent on bureaucracy and judicial things than on actually building that thing. That is not much different from the US where they need to pay multiple times more per km than in other Western countries with comparable corridors.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Please stop down voting comments you disagree with, it makes you look like a dick

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

I am not downvoting for content but debating style. You started off with ad hominem and then added not a single ( or a few) well defined argument but a video with dozens one liner arguments that cannot be addressed without writing half a book.

But maybe I am indeed in the wrong instance for that and it is indeed a wrong expectation on my side.