this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
371 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85837 readers
3548 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
371
Supreme Court rules that broad cell phone location data sweeps require warrants (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 9 hours ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking about the location evidence that is the topic of the Supreme Court ruling linked in the OP of this thread where you're crafting your bad faith arguments.

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It seems we just had a misunderstanding, I was talking about Trump's evidence. We should start over, lol. Too much Hennessy.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol

I argue in multiple tabs and sometimes get them mixed up as well. 🫡

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Yea, I done fucked up again lol.