this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
393 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

49702 readers
601 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

People don't even want you to play a video game in private now.

"Gibbons cut in: "They're illegal. They are not in any way affiliated with Microsoft. Microsoft, for Minecraft, has gotten a lot of criticism because of those community servers not employing the same safety standards that Microsoft does on their Minecraft servers."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 196 points 1 week ago (6 children)

[…] and just to clear this up right away: what she said was nonsense. You can, literally right now, head over to the official Minecraft website and download a .jar file to let you run your own private server.

I love how confidently stupid and wrong she was here.

What I fucking hate is this pattern of attacks on open source and self-hosting we’ve been seeing. Anthropic’s CEO saying that open source self-hosted LLMs are “dangerous” for example.

[–] StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Open source LLMs are very dangerous for their bottom line, they have all the same problems as non open source LLMs and the shareholders don't even make money off of them!

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes. This is a classic case of a large company buying an open source product that was specifically designed to get children to be creative and build their own worlds and then deciding that such usage is illegal unless you pay loads of money.

A perfect snapshot of enshitification.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Minecraft was never open source.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I was wrong. It was available free early on when it was pre-release.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I think that would count as enclosure

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

But that didn't even happen. Microsoft still specifically enables (let alone allows) running private servers. The ESA is just lying.

[–] strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not just open source and self-hosting. They're going after Steam because they actually treat their customers well. Despite still not truly owning your games on their, you basically do. As long as Steam is good, gamers won't forget that services can be good, and we can't have that, can we?

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

omg omg it strawverry from the hit game madeline

[–] strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

indeed :3

I've beaten every level, and I'm working on the goldberries :3

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i have all b and a sides, 5 golden berries, and 3 c sides, currently im playing strawberry jam

[–] strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

waow thats based

i have two golden berries, i think. i definitely have the winged one, and maybe another.

ive yet to play strawberry jam. it seems like it might be harder than getting all the golden berries? im not sure.

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

strawberry jam has 5 lobbies, the first is comparable to a bit hardrr a-sides, the second is more like b sides and idk how about the rest i didnt play them yet. anyway its much easier than most of goldens, and for sure easier than getting them all because there is only around 200 players who got all the berries (because of farewell)

cool! ill have to check it out.

im now even more motivated to get all the berries lol

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hadn’t heard of Steam being dragged into this. Just let us have some nice things!

[–] strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For real. I think it ended up being alright, but they sued Valve because of gambling in Counter Strike‽ Like, have they never heard of Overwatch‽

Meanwhile, "Epic" Games profits off of kids who sneak their parents' credit cards for whatever nonsense is going on in Fortnite, and Roblox is full of predators!

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of those, including Counter Strike, are preying on addiction and should either be illegal or at least regulated

True, but why are they only suing Valve? It's sus.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago

Nice LLM you have there. Be a real shame if one that costs 1/10 the price (and another that can run on a consumer rig self hosted) could outperform it.

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

That woman is very angering.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh but they are VERY dangerous. Dangerous for the 1%’s wealth. What will they do if they have to downsize their billion dollar yachts?????

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But the thing is? They're not. Billionaires would still be billionaires without attacking open source and self hosting.

The problem is that billionaires are hungry ghosts. It's not enough to be fabulously wealthy, they just want more. Forever.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 1 week ago

I know. I was being facetious.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

They can have more immortality in death.