this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
145 points (98.7% liked)

Programming

27526 readers
354 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw an issue today on a fairly popular project (better-auth, see the link to the issue attached). No repro, no context, just a wall of caps and profanity ending in "fuck you". The maintainers ship this for free. People run production businesses on top of it, for free. And the thanks is someone raging into a text box because a minor bump cost them an afternoon.

I maintain and contribute to a few projects myself, so this hits a nerve a bit. Something people don't see from the outside: it's not enough to know how to build the thing. You also have to know how to defuse a thread where someone's insulting you and not fire back, even though most of us aren't paid for any of it, let alone the work of staying civil while being told to get fucked.

I'm not pretending breaking changes don't cause real pain (that's what the issue is about). But I keep coming back to a boundary question: if you're not paying for it, do you actually get to demand anything? (Obviously yes, but we still need some boundaries)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 38 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Naah, I don't really demand anything if the author breaks something on update. I just asked if the breaking changes are intentional and if there's a workaround. Failing that, I revert and look for other libraries or roll my own. To me Open Source is always about making something you love without any obligation. Not even to follow semver.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

That view of open source only applies for non-profits and hobbyists, releasing code that solves their problems altruistically.

Corporations, startups, and VC's abuse open source by using it as a means to gain goodwill and trust until they are funded or profitable, then they perform a bait and switch or other parasitic practices; they deserve the hate, and can eat shit and die.

Also, if you're not gonna follow semver don't use semver. Just use YYYY-MM-DD or whatever. Quite simple really.

Regarding this project; anyone who chooses to use new (thus untrustworthy) foss libraries in prod without version pinning and thorough integration testing is an idiot.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, choosing to establish the semver social contract and then break it is not great