1025
Cleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Them
(www.gadgetreview.com)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
1025 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
86252 readers
4092 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Since they are operating illegally, does that mean we can just take them? They have RAM.
And, I believe, those models have TPUs.
And huge amounts of copper.
Wait what?
I don't think they're operating illegally. It's just the city is no longer paying them.
And who did Flock pay for the land usage to install the cameras?
No one, and the city has not asked them too. When someone puts up a sign by the road that says "Slow Children" they don't pay the city for it, and most people do NOT own the land between the sidewalk and the road, they just mow/maintain it out of moral obligation.
The city decided not to renew the contract, they need to make another action to ensure their removal, or construct a law about them for them to actually be "illegal".
I bet if I went out and did it they would find a way to make it illegal really quick.
They don't pay, the customer pays them.
Honestly probably more than my system has now.