Games

25414 readers

968 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

457

I can't justify spending $80 on a game I won't own. (lemmy.world)

submitted 17 hours ago by HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can't use the word "buy" if you can't actually buy the thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Highest price is not necessarily most best for profit. They likely calculated that selling it for 70 or 90 means less profit then selling it for 80.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

the higher price means less purchases,

It is an optimisation issue, once you have a reasonable localise estimate on how much people are willing to pay, finding the ideal price is trivial.

Unless there is a public expectation like games being no more than 60$, but then companies try to break those expectations too, that is why lots of releases have special editions with BS addons. to test the waters