this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
459 points (90.5% liked)

Technology

86188 readers
2984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would like to offer a slightly different perspective: I believe framework is uniquely positioned to survive the ram apocalypse (at least respect to their scale).

In the sense that, framework user can keep purchasing and upgrading components, like battery, screen, speaker, hinge, expansion card, without needing to worry about ram prices, and framework can profit from these component without needing to subsidize ram prices.

That being said, as a smaller company, they certainly don't have the same amount of bargaining power on ram as most big players, and the launch of LPCAM2 is a bit risky, since that pervents people from purchasing new ram/board/laptops given the current ram prices.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Does a new generation mobo/chip combination generally still support the older generation of RAM?

[–] spectrums_coherence@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, not on intel core ultra 3 unfortunately (unless you have LPCAMM2 lying around, which is unlikely), that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

that is the risky part I mentioned in the end.

That's what I get for only reading 2/3 of your comment before responding.