this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
244 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

16138 readers
674 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/technology/p/1247241/all-cars-sold-in-the-eu-now-require-a-camera-aimed-at-your-face-its-still-not-clear-wher

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1247209/all-cars-sold-in-the-eu-now-require-a-camera-aimed-at-your-face-its-still-not-clear-wher

Starting July 7, 2026, every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera aimed at your face. Glance at your phone, your kids in the back seat, or the radio for too long, and the car will flash a warning light and sound an alert.

Automakers have known this was coming for years. What they, and EU regulators, have never spelled out is what happens to that footage after the alert goes off.

While the intention behind the new system is difficult to dispute, its implementation has raised several concerns. Early real-world testing suggests the distraction warnings can be overly sensitive and potentially distracting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

EFF or some other privacy org should set up a shop that specializes in removing this cruft from new vehicles, to bait a legal fight with the government or car industry.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just stick tape over the camera?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The camera is just the latest thing, there's a lot more than just that.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what else is there? I don't own a car, so I'm a bit out of the loop on this.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cars these days are run almost entirely by an onboard computer called the ECU, and most components of the car are operated by sub-electronics connected to that ECU. The ECU and sub-components are usually custom to the make and model, any sub-component not functioning as expected will often trigger the ECU to not allow the car to start. Modern cars also record all driver actions and engine data to a 'black box' that can be used against the driver by insurance. They also have cell network transceivers that phone home arbitrary data to the manufacturer. Everything is integrated intentionally in such a way that modifying anything has the potential to break everything.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the writeup. I'll guess I'll continue to avoid owning a car.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks. I'm just hoping rail becomes better.