this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
642 points (99.4% liked)
Technology
86219 readers
3203 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been making the comparison to the first synthesizer in 1897. It was so huge, that it took up the basement of an entire city block in NYC. It was enormous, and relatively useless but it worked...technically. But 60 years of development later, and it can be put in a suitcase and carried around.
I see data centers and AI the same way. Sure, we can technically do it, but it's big, unwieldy, and wasteful. It clearly isn't ready for prime time.
Go back to the drawing board, address the real problems, including regulations, and get back to us in a decade or two, when they've figured out how to do this properly. Because right now it's a monstrosity that's more of a curiosity than an useful product.
"Figure out who to do this properly" means a completely different method. What they've built is way, way too expensive for too little return. What they want to do may not even be possible, too little is known about the human mind to assume it is. It's all assumptions and hubris at this point, no proof. Not everything we imagine is possible.
Still going to take massive amounts of data to train an AI.