this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
516 points (98.3% liked)

Games

49533 readers
1140 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If you compare the reactions and statements of John Romero and John Carmack you really get a feeling for who of them is a empathetic human being with interest in his fellow humans and their work and who isn't or in other words, John Carmack please bugger off to your useless AI company.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

John Romero aged like fine wine.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah. Definitely would.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think John Carmack is sociopathic. He just thinks differently, and isn't the most socially-adapt person. He was trying to reason out why the decision was made in the first place:

"Games are competing with every other option for spending your leisure time and money, and the competition is brutal."

He's definitely not wrong. I still think Microsoft's decision was pretty fucking stupid, but disposable entertainment options are at an all-time high, and even with gaming, you can throw a stick up in the air and have it land on a game studio.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Carmack is a unique case where he's an obvious autist and pretty smart, but is a brute force pragmatist within that.

So he isn't a sociopath, per normal understanding, but structurally he's extremely close, and effectively he is, especially when you realize how much thought he's put into his direction and decisions compared to most people.

The closest metaphor I can think of is like a robot that chooses to embrace Nazism because it's pragmatic and has the highest chance for his own survival.

If conditions were different, he would go with that, but they aren't, and so he is.

However, I will say I won't rule him out/write him off/say he's a terrible person, because I still assume he's rational and not belligerent, which are two deeply entrenching and judgemental qualities. But that also being said, people like him are sometimes the most dangerous because their logic is genuine, but half baked, and so sways many more immediately dangerous people, and effectively public opinion and popular rhetoric.