this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
650 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86252 readers
4029 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The big thing here is this printer is repairable, there no spyware or vendor lock in for specific ink cartridges.

This is hardware that if you buy you truly own.

Honestly for these reasons alone I am going to buy this.

[–] variaatio@nord.pub 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I went immediately "they started making opensource print heads.... since that is huge effort"... Oh it is just a carrier assembly for HP inkcartridges. Sure hack refillable ones, but still the main printing part is from big corporate. Waiting for the moment of "HP implemented backward DRM on their cartridge. HP cartridge only works, if it hears correct attestation from the printer."

This all is based on them hacking a corporate part and that is newer sustainable open hardware route.

Using a print head a maker sells as just "We make printheads, what you do with it after is your business. We exactly sell these as industrial parts from people to build printer around (or whatever other device you have use for ink depositing thingie in)" fine. That is normal.

But "hey we made open inkjet printer". "So you figured the vast tasks of designing and manufacturing inkjet print heads?" "No" "You found a suitable standard industrial part to build around, less amazing, but still okay?" "No" "So what did you figure out or provide to table?" "We hacked HPs part". Soooo everyone using this is still paying HP tax and who knows HP might shut this whole thing down one way or another.

edit: Not to mention it is not like it is some impossible task to get inkjet printheads, like all legit and so on. One web search later leads for example to KonicaMinolta industrials website for their catalog of "Here we sell just the Inkjet heads, incase you want to make a printer. Here is the spec sheet how to run it."

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 6 hours ago

So in the end is just another open project goin to fail :(

[–] crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fair, and I admire them for trying. I was just pointing out that these specs are closer to a 10-15 yo laser printer, which is likely cheaper to buy and print with.

If they were producing q laser printer of similar specs with open firmware I'd be first in line to get one.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

A 10 to 15 year old laser printer is going to have its fuser fail in a year and that replacement part costs as much as a new printer.