this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1496 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

86332 readers
3326 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 110 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good. Anyone caught wearing those in public should have them knocked the fuck off their faces...

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I dont think this is deserving of violence, shouting "YO THIS PERVERT IS CREATING PORN OF ME ON HIS GLASSES" and making a big scene of it should be fun

[–] db2@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

And then the violence.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No the reason they are too scared to wear them is because of the threats of violence.

No threat. Promise.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

"Wasn't he looking at your kids earlier?" to the biggest dad you find around.

Just kidding: be responsible! Punch the creep yourself!

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Should revive the old term "glasshole"

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was at an event and the host was wearing them

In the context of “his job is a promoter and you’re at an event he’s promoting, and he’s not hiding that he’s recording” I was kind of okay with it.

But normally you’d have some side conversations with the guy and I felt really awkward with him wearing the glasses.

I felt their presence made the event worse. A video guy would have been fine by contrast, because there’s judgement and editorial reatraint.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, I would have walked out. There are precious few pictures of me in this world (and the ones that exist are mostly celluloid) and my plan is to keep it that way as much as possible...

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

You might like my spouse

We were at a dinner event and they hired a drone operator to film it. So we’re sitting there, the musician is going on stage, and you hear brrrrrrrrrrrrr zrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr the whole fucking time as this drove flies around you. We had an edge seat next on a patio so we’re the front row for the drone…

She spent the entire evening flipping off that drone so the footage wouldn’t be usable.

They didn’t ask for consent or a waiver or notify you they were doing that. We had tickets to multiple nights (bought months in advance) and they did this at all of them. We actually thought it was some annoying kid trying to be a brat until I saw the drone guy talking to the staff at the end of the night.

Super obnoxious.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are some legitimate use cases. I mean as a hard of hearing person I’d love to be able to live caption my daily life (the tech isn’t quite there yet but it’s close). We should be pressuring governments to require visual indicators that they’re recording instead of policing individual users.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Display glasses do that without the camera... You don't need a camera to transcribe voice to text...

But I get it...there can be...but in the end, Rule 34 applies and all technology will be used for sex.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Erm, ackshually, Rule 34 is “if it exists, there is porn of it”.

Which means somewhere, there’s pics OF sexy anthropomorphic meta glasses. Maybe not even anthropomorphic.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 2 points 9 hours ago

LOL, you sound like my son, he does that to me all the time..

You're probably right, but I said what I said. ;-)