this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1496 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

86332 readers
3784 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"A lot of men and their behaviors have ruined this product."

That's men acting as they intended using a product as intended. There is no plot twist here.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

yup. they knew what they were doing when they made it possible to kill the notifcation light without killing the recording.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I remember this media cycle from the GoogleGlass era. And while the initial reporting was "People are viciously attacking anyone seen wearing them!", the business post-mortem was more that nobody was buying them to begin with.

These glasses are oversized, heavy, ugly, and pretty much useless for anyone who isn't a pervert. The sticker price for this largely pointless gadget can go north of $800 retail. That's a high-end PC or fully loaded PS5 for a small camera that sits on your face and some lenses that give you a Virtual Boy tier of AR overlay.

Who has time for this shit? There's no use-case.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Excuse me but whens the last time you priced a “high end pc”? You’re living in the past…

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

whens the last time you priced a “high end pc”?

👉👈 Maybe five years ago. Even then, I'll admit "high end" is generous.

$800 is still a ton of money for an ugly pair of glasses with a gimmick nobody has implemented.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

A high end gpu is >$2000 nowadays 😅

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

I mean, I saw 32GB ram sticks going for $1k the other day.

But you can get a Ryzen 9 9950X for under $700. The chips going up into the four and five figures are for very high end video rendering and machine learning.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

To be fair, you can get a $800 high end PC... but it would be used and 4 to 5 generations out of date.

[–] michaelalf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

$800 might buy you the concept of a high end PC.

I can think of several use-cases: subtitles for the hearing impaired, translation, AR overlays for technical work, etc. Not saying they're a good value, but it seems weird to say there's no use-case.

And I genuinely don't understand the pervert angle. What do they do for perverts that can't be done with much cheaper button/pen cameras, or even a phone in your breast pocket?

Like sure, there are problems with surveillance and ads and other nasty tech bro shit, that much is obvious. But I sincerely do not understand why they're being called pervert glasses. Am I missing something?