this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
553 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40814 readers
4515 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

On one hand you have people saying - rightfully so - that such media should be restricted, because even though some argue (without proof) that it reduces harm

Personally I think in a free society something should be legal by default, unless it is proven to cause harm, not the other way around like you suggest.

that person will be labelled a paedophile, rightfully so...

And I think this kind of mindset is poison to democracy

[–] fonix232@fedia.io -5 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Okay, repeat after me:

👏 SEXUALISING 👏 CHILDREN 👏 CAUSES 👏 HARM 👏

It's that simple.

and no, naming a mental illness (paedophilia) what it is isn't "poison to democracy".

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 9 points 13 hours ago

Repeat after me now:

👏USING👏HAND👏CLAP/STAR/WHATEVER👏EMOJI👏DOESN'T👏MAKE👏WHAT👏YOU👏SAY👏MORE👏IMPACTFUL👏

There's a very clear gap in knowledge that is being raised here, and it's genuinely unknown whether fictional materials increase or decrease the rates of abuse. Judging by more general examples, it is most likely to decrease, but we need more data.

Also, pedophilia is not classified as mental illness. Pedophilic disorder is, but that requires specific criteria to be filled, namely being an active danger to children (getting into child abuse or consuming CSAM involving real children) and/or having distress about being a pedophile (for example, hating oneself and being suicidal).

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You didn't "name" an illness you talked about ad hominem attacks

[–] fonix232@fedia.io -1 points 12 hours ago

Calling a paedophile (someone sexually attracted to children) a paedophile, is calling the disorder by its name. It's not ad hominem in any manner.

But the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between a paedophile (a person afflicted by a disorder they usually do NOT want, someone who deserves appropriate psychiatric help), and a child rapist (someone who has raped a child, and deserves no empathy, but appropriate steps to ensure they never harm a child) is quite telling.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago

Do you think that lolicon/csam/etc creates pedophiles?

It's personally revolting, but I think it's at least worth considering whether something like lolicon can reduce chances of a pedophile acting on their urges.