this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
556 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40814 readers
4538 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The two things are pretty much the same thing though.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

not that i really want to continue the discussion (we agree that SA is bad and the people doing it should be put in prison) but isn't this a bit like saying furry porn is pretty much the same as bestiality?

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's like saying drawn porn between a human and animal is the same as bestiality, which it is. A cartoon sheep is still a sheep.

Furries are basically alternate humanoids like elves. With your logic every time someone fucks with cat ears on then it's a crime, nya.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

i mean... i've seen that kinda porn on furry sites. there's a whole subgenre. usually the animals can talk, but they're still animals. as in, not anthropomorphic.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I get the angle you're going for: if Beast Boy from Teen Titans turns into an actual horse and fucks Raven, is it bestiality? The answer is, we have no precedent in law or morality for intelligent animals above the age of consent engaging in inter-species intercourse, so the response will depend on who you're asking. That's clearly not what I was referring to, though, and it feels like this is turning into whataboutism.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

that wasn't my intention. i just think the rules are different with drawn material, that was what i was trying to illustrate. the law also distinguishes the two, at least where i live. i know that varies greatly by country, and there's the question of whether the artist is using reference, but considering how unrealistic most hentai is wrt proportions and poses that feels like it would stick out.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a legal grey area where I live too… but in my opinion we shouldn't normalise it, and I definitely don't like it in my anime. That's what I'm trying to point at. This is a very sensitive issue, and there's also a lot of things getting mixed up in this thread. Legality, morality, child protections, anime, real life, normalisation… are all getting lumped together into a tangled mess. So let's untangle it.

Cartoons vs reality

It's important to separate people who look at explicit cartoons online that don't affect anyone in real life, as long as they're keenly aware that it's not socially tolerated, with… other types of people. The golden rule is, if your actions and habits affect anyone in real life, it's not ok. Any art based on real humans is not ok here. Real photography is definitely not ok here.

In this thread I think we all agree we're talking about the first kind, not the second kind. The second kind is not tolerated anywhere I want to live.

Morality

Personally, to my own morals, I don't give a fuck what people look at on their own PC; again, with the caveat that it is completely separate from reality. If I found out, or they told me, I would look at them suspiciously and differently from that point onwards for sus behaviour. Actually imagine if you discovered an entire hard drive full of this kind of content… this is not normally, check him PC.

Each person will have their own opinion here, but it doesn't personally keep me up at night that people are drawing fan-art of their favourite childhood cartoon characters. They know where the line is, stay on the safe side.

Legality

Legally, this is a grey area. As a society we haven't definitively decided what to do about this yet; at least where I live. I wouldn't be surprised if more places take a harsher stance to this content, especially with A.I. generated image proliferation, and the global trend towards laws with child protection as the stated justification. This is just speculation though.

Normalisation

Finally, this is what we're actually talking about. We've separated out all the other stuff.

A huge amount of anime has depictions of perverts like: "haha what a rascal! Typical lolicon shenanigans. How silly!" It makes it seem ok and accepted in society.

I don't believe normalising this outlook and behaviour is ok. If there's even 1 person that feels like it's acceptable to act on their urges because they saw it on a funny cartoon, that's infinite too many, and I'm sure this has happened. If nothing else, any children watching will be more likely to think this behaviour is normal, and less likely to report it.

We shouldn't be treating this kind of content as a joke or acceptable. It's not funny. It's like making rape jokes. People are uncomfortable showing their family these anime scenes because they know it's weird and wrong.

I don't know what's going on in Japan, I didn't live there long enough to have a good opinion, but we shouldn't be importing their culture in this area.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

well here it's not a grey area since 2012. it's explicitly a different thing according to our supreme court.

to your last point, i think there's research that shows that people tend to act less on their urges when given an outlet. same as with violence. in fact i think that there's even some that says that people who commit the acts do it because what they get off on is the sense of control rather than the characteristics of the victim.

that said, yeah we obviously shouldn't be encouraging creeps to act on their urges. i also don't know what the situation is in japan but it's possible that in their "shame-based society" as someone put it in the thread, calling someone out on it is enough to discourage it in a way that doesn't translate. in that case the translation is also wrong, but in the other direction; it should be harsher.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Considering the groping and upskirting epidemic in public trains in Japan, to the point that they have women-only train carriages, I'm not sure the shaming method is very effective in practice

https://maxonthemove.com/chikan-train-groping-japan/