Programming

27824 readers

272 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

What is the best moderation system for a social platform? (programming.dev)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by CoderSupreme@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of the main features of my site will be Discourse-style trust levels, the higher your trust level, the more moderation privileges you gain. I'm also considering either a jury system, where multiple users collaborate on moderation decisions, or a meta-moderation system, where users can vote "fair" or "unfair" on moderation actions taken.

Someone mentioned to me in another post that Bluesky also has a very good moderation system, but the best one I've found so far is Discourse. What I really like about it is that you earn trust levels by reading posts, not by taking moderation actions. I definitely don't want to gamify moderation the way Stack Overflow did, that was the worst I've ever seen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 3 points 5 days ago

I tend to like systems that give the user tools to moderate their own feed and content they see. Then it's up to me to decide what I want in my timeline and what I don't want. This can be a bit heavy on the system though, especially if you don't have lot of metadata and have to rely on full-text search blocking. Seems to work on Mastodon though.

This then leaves only certain moderation tasks to the server admins (automating CSAM scanning/reporting) - and filtering out content that breaks the server ToS.

Back in the days, Slashdot had a system where you could "opt-in" as a moderator, and this would randomly give you "mod-points" every now and then. You could use your points to up- or downvote posts and comments. I quite enjoyed it and it didn't feel like I had to apply for a 2nd job (which is the case with lot of other moderation systems)