this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
124 points (94.9% liked)

Movies

13708 readers
21 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

My brother just said I should go see it, and said almost everything was practical, even the cyclops

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I highly doubt that. I haven't seen it yet but Nolan uses vfx in all his films. As he should, people who think "CGI always sucks" never know how much CGI is used that they don't see.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

even the cyclops

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s just the usual lie they peddle to get people like your brother to spread. It’s got CGI all over the place.

People, including the directors etc, claimed that vecna in stranger things was “100% practical, no cgi”. They claimed that there was no cgi in top gun maverick. The truth? Yeah they filmed practical things, but then replaced literally the entire things with cgi.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

And yet, $250 million budget for practical effects. Could have saved money on CGI, which is a bonkers thing to say.

Unless the movie is Star Wars or Avengers: Endgame or Avatar, nobody should be spending a quarter of a billion dollars on a movie. Dune 2's budget was $190 million, for a sci-fi epic, with a proven audience. This is just a fantasy story.

Making the budget on debut is incredible lucky, but it might still be considered a "flop" because of the extra $200M or whatever of marketing budget.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

with a proven audience

Christopher Nolan is his own brand that has a proven audience. In a sense, Universal paid handsomely to poach him from Warner Brothers, and giving him big budgets is part of that deal.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And he has yet to disappoint or not make money so it's working fine. It already made over $260 million globally and the weekend isn't even over yet. It will absolutely still be the biggest movie to see for the next several weeks so it did it's job. Sometimes I feel like there isn't one thing on Lemmy that people can't find something to complain about! I can't wait to see it still, but there were no good seats at any theater near me when i finally decided to go. Next weekend it is!

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Lemmy is just full of contrarians because it's not-reddit. I've learned to just accept it at this point.

[–] EVOTravel@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

No it isn’t !

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah it's like how Australia was originally a penal colony for Britain...

Many people are here because they were banned from Reddit. For better and for worse.

Those of us who voluntarily came here back during the API bullshit are old hat at this point.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The whole internet is full of contrarians. I don't know why so many movie-goers are so determined not to enjoy anything

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's an xkcd pointing out that it's a lot easier to hate something everyone else likes, than to love something everyone else hates, and that honestly really changed the way I view popularity and contrarianism. I respect contrarians who can love what is hated but I'm totally dismissive of anyone trying to criticize what is popular.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I think this is a good time to say that I really enjoyed Mercy. I don't get what people's problem with it was. I think it's a cool writing challenge to tell a story with the limits of a character having to investigate the crime from a computer with a time limit and I think the movie did a good job telling a story with those limits. I thought it was exciting to watch. And, since I turn my phone off in the theatre and can't check the time, I liked that the movie periodically tells you roughly how much time is left. I also love that we are watching the story unfold in real time, with no time skips.

I will say though that the villain's motivation was kind of dumb. He could have just brought forward the evidence of his brother's innocence and discredited the AI judge. If the court wouldn't hear it, he could have made it public. It was completely unnecessary to frame another innocent man for murder

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Anytime I look up a forum thread of a movie I'm watching/wanting to watch (spoiler-free), at least half of the comments are "this movie was trash and you should feel bad for liking it."

And the other half feel the need to justify why they liked it to the half that hated it for reasons they literally can't put into words (if they do it's always the most contrived/overused excuse in critiquing).

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Doesn't Disney spend that on most of their movies.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still don't really know what you're trying to say. Did you mean to type "special effects" instead of "practical" at the beginning of your comment?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Practical effects are more expensive than computer generated, both are special effects.