this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
408 points (99.0% liked)

PC Master Race

21842 readers
1042 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
IowaMan@lemmy.world
BobaFett26@lemmy.world
The_Vampire@lemmy.world
Fudgeknuckles98@lemmy.world
CatZoomies@lemmy.world
Xeon@lemmy.ml
408
"Steam’s required AI disclosure is the right move": Devs say gen AI should be called out in games and support Valve's store mandate (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 23 hours ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Pray tell, how can an indie game dev enforce copyright? The system is designed in favor of corporations with army of lawyers, specifically to fuck over smaller creators.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If it‘s so easy why don’t we see a myriad of copyright/trademark violations by large companies?

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because you aren't looking

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Can you share some examples?

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever the fuck Nintendo is doing, for one

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

You may not like it, but their claims have a legitimate foundation. They could not release a game called „Hades“ because no army of lawyers could turn that case, that’s what you initially suggested.