this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
169 points (98.8% liked)
science
28098 readers
195 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wasn't even a deadly disease. I'm all for gen editing since it has potential to save lives but killing a 6 year okd because you would rather risk it than have an intellectually disabled child seems a bit intense.
They paid like 800k for it so this very much feels like "I'm rich enough not to have to deal with the shame my child will bring me". They should of just accepted her, what she had was basically down syndrome.
I mean… the researchers lied to the parents about the risks. How are parents supposed to make an informed decision with false information.
Yupppp, which is what IMO made this whole thing extra tragic. The disease wasn't even that bad to begin with... definitely didn't necessitate literally doing the very first in-brain gene editing (which is why they needed much higher viral dose... which caused the death)
I have no clue where the family coughed up the $800K though. They don't seem to be the particularly rich type based on what the news report was saying, but maybe the parents did hide some information...?