Selfhosted

60967 readers

662 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content (aussie.zone)

submitted 3 days ago by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn't returned to follow community rules.

Here's the original topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It's a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don't self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

OOTL Wasn't there something about forgejos capabilities to federate? I had the impression, that it would go the fediverse route with many interacting instances. Then everyone can make their own rules. There are many reason to moderate repos. So why is this such a big thing (if forgejo federates as I remembered from the back of my head)?

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Federation is still a work in progress IIRC.

But everyone can already selfhost their own instance if all they want is a web-facing git forge.

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Being able to self host a git forge was always possible, even before forgejo. Besides the gitea controversy I thought the federation to be the real killer feature.

So I guess I have to wait a bit more for the federation.

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because Codeberg is its own charity type thing they have a cohort of users that vote on decisions made and you cannot even see how they came to that decision because that area is restricted to them. Presumably they might not federate at all.

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not federating at all would be a shame IMO. I'm really exited on this feature for git forges

[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Agree but their stance on LLM content is a big put off for me. I don't share my scripts and things I write with AI but I like to keep them all together.

And it concerns me that Codeberg is the guiding hand for the forjejo project.