this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
253 points (97.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40742 readers
621 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am aware of

  • Sea-lioning
  • Gaslighting
  • Gish-Galloping
  • Dogpiling

I want to know I theres any others I'm not aware of

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a series "The Alt Right Playbook" that covers a lot of bad faith and manipulative tactics, many of which are used online.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I hate the one where you call them a fascist (because they literally are) and then they come around and call you a "blue MAGA".

like bitch, if I was "blue MAGA" I'd be making IEDs and forcing abortions on women and shit. ain't nobody got time for that. I'm building a garden so I can fuckin eat this year.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I use bluemaga to refer to people who behave like MAGA supporters but for the Dems: people who believe all disagreement should be forbidden, like the guy currently stalking me across multiple instances to insult me because I disagreed with him about the Democrats policy on Gaza.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

people who believe all disagreement should be forbidden, like the guy currently stalking me across multiple instances to insult me because I disagreed with him about the Democrats policy on Gaza.

Btw I have asked you what your policy would be instead so that I can understand what your take is, but you won't clarify, so I can only conclude you are a massive troll.

Let me say tldr it once again:

I put forth the claim that we have a better shot of influencing the dems for a ceasefire that the evangelical Rs. Palestine is in desperate need for one.

By the time of the election Palestine was in bad shape and needs to be able to live to fight another day. I never said dems were saints; just that the pragmatic need for the palestiniant people means we need to put political support in the place we can most influence; which at the time is voting blue.

Go ahead and let us know what your policy take is. If you are serious and not a troll that is.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 18 hours ago

Btw I have asked you what your policy would be instead so that I can understand what your take is, but you won’t clarify, so I can only conclude you are a massive troll.

I have, you ignored my posts so you could continue to slander and strawman me. All for the sin of disagreement. You concluded i was a "Massive troll" because I disagreed with you.

By the time of the election Palestine was in bad shape and needs to be able to live to fight another day

Because the Democrats were helping to exterminate them.

I never said dems were saints;

No, but you do deny their genocide, and attack anyone who disagrees.

that the pragmatic need for the palestiniant people means we need to put political support in the place we can most influence; which at the time is voting blue.

The Democrats were and are completely committed to the Palestinian genocide, we have no ability to influence that, as the previous 18 months showed. But you will not accept that, because you are a genocide denier.

Go ahead and let us know what your policy take is. If you are serious and not a troll that is.

Go ahead and read my posts rather than stalking my comment history to call me a troll under unrelated posts.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Calling someone "blue MAGA" is the equivalent of saying "no you!"

However, it's time to stop pretending like some small group of "MAGA" conservatives have hijacked the party and taken things too far. The monied interests backing Trump are the same as have been backing Republicans for decades. The Federalist Society, the Heritage Foundation, etc. Mitch McConnell has been working to fill the federal courts with Federalist picks for a long time. Picking or just outright manufacturing court cases that would set new precedents. Hell, even those thinktanks are just recent iterations of the same interest's attempts to shape the government as they see fit. Trump is just a nepo baby turned grifter who got lucky because his grift was actually effective at attracting and controlling the loudest segment of the Republican base.

Trump just transparently said "As long as I get filthy rich, get to be king, and you keep [metaphorically] sucking my dick, I'll keep my followers in line and use my position to put your people in power so they can implement your 'Project 25' or whatever." Republicans mostly objected to him because he lacked subtlety and was transparently greedy and petty. He ignored the game of slow, subtle changes and manipulation through "decorum" that Republicans had become experts in. Unfortunately for us, that worked wonders on a subset of the population

The people who helped those Republican politicians keep getting elected and basically wrote their proposed laws noticed Trump was popular. When it became apparent that Trump's followers were loyal, the money jumped at the chance to fast track their vision and backed him completely. They helped tweak and hone Trump's message to amplify his grifter magic. That plus some changes to election laws around the country, gerrymandering, and likely other more covert, extralegal vote manipulation got him back in power.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Anyone who unironically says "blue MAGA" immediately gives themselves away as someone to not take seriously.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

@BrainInABox@lemmy.ml is a troll.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

I committed the grievous sin of disagreeing with @internetCitizen, so they have stalked my comment history to respond call me a troll under every comment I've made.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago

Blue maga? I wouldn't encourage people to vote for the Democrat party if it had any viable competition.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, I think you have the definition of that word wrong blue Maga is just the people on the left that are making money, commenting, andreacting to the shit people do on the right. CNN and MSNBC telling us the latest bullshit Trump has done is a blue Maga type behavior

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was under the impression it was the "Hillary warned us" and "Putin is behind everything" crowd, since it mirrors the MAGA saviour and conspiracy fantasies.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Oh wow. You see, Russia is behind all this, holy crap this nation is cooked. It’s fucked it’s gone. I have a person on the Internet telling me Russia isn’t behind anything and they are totally not planning the destruction of the United States because they Totally have not had a singular leader(Putin) for the last 30 or so years where we have TOTTALY NOT had disruption every four or so😏

Anyways, I looked up the definition for myself and it looks like you’re the one that’s right, At least about the Hillary part. so sorry for my rant.