this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
29 points (91.4% liked)

Asklemmy

55349 readers
70 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know a lone modern fighter jet would make a huge difference but have always wondered about a tank

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] digdilem@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Interesting question.

I think not, on the grand scale. Whilst yes, it would vastly outclass other tanks, you're forgetting about the adaptability and inventiveness of humans. I believe they would find a way to disable it fairly quickly - after all, WW2 was a constant stream of one fighting unit encountering new technology - Allies had nothing like the German Railgun for example, but it had little influence in the outcome. Also, like the Tirpiz, something like this could become a liability. It would become such a target that it would tie up a huge amount of resources protecting it. Modern tanks are still vulnerable in many ways - even from as simple a thing as just digging a hole in the ground and covering it with branches caveman style.

[โ€“] blackbrook@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which leads to asking, are there any technological advances they could learn from it and duplicate, and how much could those affect the war?

[โ€“] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, absolutely. Good point.

[โ€“] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From what I've read since I posted the question. The armor would simply shrug off tank shells of that day. Don't even know if mines from that era would be effective against them. The only issue would be the resources.

[โ€“] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So they lure it over a pit packed to the brim with dynamite. Throw enough explosives at anything and it will be destroyed. And if there's only one of them, they will put the effort in to disable it.

[โ€“] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Even something as simple and dumb as "a mine takes out one of the tracks and then you snipe any motherfucker dumb enough to get out and fix it". Once your tank is immobile, it becomes a pillbox. Your tank can't now get the fuck out of a situation at 80MPH, so a couple of jackasses with a crowbar and a couple grenades can take your tank out pretty damn easy.

Anti tank warfare has LARGELY not changed since WWII. The tech has gotten better, but the tactics pretty much remain the same.