this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
157 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

87147 readers
3836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1327151/youtube-announces-monetization-changes-that-make-it-harder-for-new-creators-to-make-mone

New creators applying for YouTube Partner Program (YPP) will need 8,000 qualified watch hours in the last 365 days, or 20 million qualified Shorts views in the last 90 days.

Old requirements for comparison:

1,000 subscribers with 4,000 watch hours in the past year or 10 million Shorts views in the past 90 days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is bullshit. 4000 hours of watch time was already a near impossible goal for new channels, especially after the past year's UI and algorithm changes. Now they want twice that?!?

It's theft. Even if you only have 100 views, you should be eligible for a cut of the profits you generated with your content.

The market is dying for a new competitor to come in and disrupt their monopoly

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

As someone who is currently monetized with 5000 watch hours in the past year, I'm super mixed on this. On the one hand, I'm only making like 30 bucks per month, basically nothing, so I can see how YouTube would want to reduce overhead. On the other hand, that $30 bucks per month is a nice little bonus. I'd still be creating without it, but it is nice to have, and, YouTube already doesn't pay out until you hit $100, so that oughtta reduce most of the overhead. It seems like it'd be a better solution to just raise that to a $200 minimum or something. You're probably right, it might just be greed.

Putting ads on these creator's videos AND not paying creators is wild though, no matter how small the channel is.

Side note: Am I at risk of becoming un-monetized?? I know it's possible.

Side note the second: I host my own instance of PeerTube for my videos - https://joeltube.com/

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The problem is infrastructure costs. You’re either spending a metric shit ton of money on hardware or you’re spending a metric fuck ton of money on renting it.