this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
799 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87184 readers
3655 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your government and mine may be different.

I'd rather have my subsistence at the whims of the government than at the whims of a billionaire business owner.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's a false dichotomy. I would rather have my subsistence at the whims of the entirety of the country's economic activity than any government, which is one election away from changing its mind about how much to pay me. Markets are constrained by their environment. If my employer cuts my pay, I can leave and go elsewhere.

The billionaires are responsible for the fact we're even talking about needing alternative economic systems in the first place. They and the governments are the same people, or at least their representatives.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would rather have my subsistence at the whims of the entirety of the country's economic activity

Ok, how do we organize that in an equitable manner?

Isn't that more-or-less what a government is supposed to be?

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In my country, we could do so by enforcing laws that are already on the books that exist for this exact purpose. You start with the Sherman Antitrust act and break up any company with more than X% market share in any market they operate in. You enforce the Glass-Steagall and Frank-Dodd acts forbidding conventional banks from investing in speculative markets, and then sit back and watch the economy work like it does in the textbooks.

Of course, all this is predicated on the government functioning. If it does not, the laws are irrelevant and the markets are just lawless warzones with non-corporate entities (like individual humans) acting as the blades of grass underfoot. So, step 1 is to restore the government to the point where the will of the governed is acted upon. Step 2 is the stuff I said above.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

So, step 1 is to restore the government

I hope you guys can accomplish that before they permanently destroy your country (and mine, as your president has threatened to do multiple times).