this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
277 points (98.3% liked)

memes

22317 readers
1363 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By the way, you chrome users loss many powerful functionalities. Your daily browsing become less secure and more exposed to harmful online advertisement created by google itself. Pop the bubble and wake up. Consider another browser.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Measurable? How about you back that up with a source.

[–] LytiaNP@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago

(/j)

In all seriousness though, this sums it up quite well: It is a few years old, but most of the problems still apply https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html

I said measurably because I do remember seeing benchmarks somewhere about the browser security, but as of now I can't find them. That said, while Firefox is worse, from a security standpoint, than chrome, it's generally more private (letterboxing, resist fingerprinting, etc.) but for me, the security tradeoff isn't worth it.

I know a lot of people probably won't believe me when I say this, but I do like Firefox (a lot more than Chrome and its derivatives) but when you can't sandbox browsers without significantly weakening the browser's sandbox (a little unintuitive), I choose to put security and browser integrity above personal preference.

If you or anyone else wants to use firefox, it's not like you're instantly going to compromise your machine. Firefox just lacks a lot of the security that chrome has, and thus has a greater potential for exploitation.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I measured it with a ruler and it's about 3 inches less secure.

[–] OhmeHose@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's that in metric measurements?

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something a bit more than 7.5cm, less secure.

[–] OhmeHose@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

That sounds pretty average to me!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago

His proof? a payslip from Alphabet.

[–] ivn@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IronFox, the Android hardened Firefox say so and provide some sources.

https://ironfoxoss.org/docs/limitations/#security

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The issue I take with the analysis is that data theft by Google is not flagged as a secure problem because it's a feature.

[–] ivn@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's because security and privacy are two different things.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Oh .. derp .. I thought this was posted in the privacy community.