this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
570 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
3864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd encourage everyone to read the article. It paints a far more nuanced picture than the headline suggests.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Nuanced yes, but it largely being driven by a Japanese guy who wanted to sell US software and US companies who didn't want to compete by actually selling compatible hardware is no less damning.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. That guys "nuance" comment made me read the article, and I'm glad I did, but the end result was my expectation going in; the profit motive of capitalism killed a FOSS OS that could have nullified Americas tech dominance before it even started.

There's no way to know how it would've played out, but I could see Bill Gates' connected family greasing the wheels of geopolitics to scare the Japanese out of implementing it, or being the catalyst promoting exclusive US proprietary tech rights to Japanese capitalists, or the CIA/NSA arguing that a Japanese controlled FOSS OS would make it harder for them to influence tech standards. Basically, like most things I've learned about history, it's likely that morally and ethically bankrupt, sociopathic, criminals had their hands balls deep in the clusterfuck of a horror show, in many more ways than one.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to the article it was royalty free and published open standards, but they do not make any claim to this being an FOSS system.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago

Per Wikipedia…

TRON does not specify the source code for the kernel, but instead is a "set of interfaces and design guidelines" for creating the kernel. This allows different companies to create their own versions of TRON, based on the specifications, which can be suited for different microprocessors.

It’s not even a software project as we know it. It’s a specification like POSIX, and presumably, anything implementing the spec can be certified if it passes a test suite, like UNIX.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

It would have been a completely rigged game for a US company to try and sell and TRON products in the Japanese market.

This is exactly why it was protectionism and could have caught trade sanctions had it been more widely adopted.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

It gives more details, but it doesn't particularly make the US not look like a bunch of dickholes whose definition of "free market" changes to shape whatever suits them from one moment to the next.