this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
62 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
87390 readers
4455 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The way to be effective is to fight.
GenAI needed to regulated years ago and I'm sorry but no amount of us asking nicely or fighting fair is going to stop technofascists from building their surveillance state.
In fact the past month has seen a huge uptick in stories about the "ineffectiveness" of fighting AI.
The timing of this while anti AI backlash is at an all time high tells me everything I need to know.
If the original comment offered solutions, different story.
There is no value in telling people to stop fighting.
"Thank god we fought for accessibility or those guys would have had a hell of time getting that wheelchair into the concentration camp."
Fwiw I am NO stranger to accessibility as my father lost both of his legs. Do you know how often accessibility is just used to gain political favor? Or how often it is literally just horseshit for show?
Preserving our current fuckass levels of accessibility while making it even easier on GenAI companies just doesn't feel right.
Regulated by whom? You can't really stop someone from making tensors and scraping the web. The only good way I could see it happen would be the US enforcing it's embargo powers, but that cat is out of the bag. I don't see how countries like China would accept it and I also do not foresee the US trying the entire rest of the world to agree to a trade embargo with China either. Especially nowadays where the US showed multiple times that they are an unreliable partner. Even open local models are strong enough to probably scrape stuff on their own.
Let's see what was written.
I don't believe I saw "stop fighting" in those sentences.
I did see "this fucks things up for many people, and this has little to no impact on ai scraping."
You have a very different interpretation of those sentences from me. I'd also point out the root of the issue has nothing to do with llm's, and everything to do with capitalism.
Maybe try fighting the cause of the problem rather than the most recent means of exploitation?
The cause of the problem is being bolstered by the companies that make gen AI my dude. They're all the in the same trench coat, and they also make the accessibility laws.
I hate to tell you this but America has been captured by corporations for decades. Fuck them, and fuck anyone who dares to tell me stop fighting.
This screams astro turfing campaign against users fighting, and I'm not buying it.
Whether its gen ai or something else, the root cause is the same.
You are suggesting something that breaks things for a good number of people and has little to no impact on a specific subset of a specific type of company is the only way to fight back.
That is nonsense.
This is the part implying that there is nothing worth doing:
no, that says this specific thing is not worth doing.
Have you heard of implication? Here are two definitions of "imply", from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imply:
Thank you.
Reading truly is fundamental.
Please explain how "this isn't effective, but does negatively impact regular people" is the same as "don't fight back".
I'd love to hear this explanation. Please. Enlighten me.