this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
230 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse

43570 readers
243 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://fedihood.social/about

FediHood is a social network built around the place where you live. You choose a city and the topics you care about, then read what neighbours are saying and join in.

It stays a normal fediverse app. Your posts can reach Mastodon, PixelFed, Misskey and the rest, and posts from those servers reach you too.

Source code: https://git.holos.social/tom79/FediHood

There's only one instance so far: https://fedihood.social/

If new instances are created, they should show up here: https://fedihood.fediverse.observer/list

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This seems unreasonable to me:

Only one browser at a time holds the keys decrypting new messages, moving needs a fresh backup from the active browser.

Messages sent after the backup was taken stay unreadable on this browser.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think an encrypted message feature is necessary for this kind of a web app. If people want to send encrypted messages, they can just switch to a different service for that. Like you get them to know on fedihood, exchange matrix handles or phone numbers or whatever, and then you can use a different service for private communication.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Less friction is better though. And not everyone knows where else to go for E2E.

The problem to me would be development burden, but its alreast implemented so...

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

E2EE is very hard to implement safely. serious cryptography is not a hobbyist project. just look at all the problems matrix has had with it.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 4 hours ago

Because AI Surveillance states are nothing for concern.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes e2ee much easier that way.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like it should still work if making a backup didn't clear a browser, and restoring to a second browser should let both work.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

key management is lot harder. signal does not support multi-clients for a reason, you can look at the history of matrix with encryption to find out what are the problem is. I'm not sure they even fixed or just know of all the failure modes of it.