this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
888 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41524 readers
3767 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Cool, since you have that version of the film I'm sure you'll be willing to share it? I've seen 2 matte versions, but none like you're describing.

You don't seem to understand what this sub is for. Since your uncle worked for Nintendo, I'm sure you know the moon landing took place a few years before OPs example of awful CGI from 1996. I argued that much better CGI existed in 1993. That's still at least two years off from the moon landing.

Everyone is making fun of people who claim it was faked. I'm glad your cousin was the King of Space. That's cool. I missed it by 3 space votes in the last space election. I'm jealous.

[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, while the cgi shown is trash, it really isn't all that bad considering what they had at the time for a kid's show. They were producing a 30 minute episode a week on a budget that was surely a pittance, much less than 1/4 I'm sure, of a 2 hour film that we would consider really good at the time.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't mean to insult your show, I just don't see why anyone would have been watching that when way more awesome things like Gargoyles existed at the same time.

[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ha! I loved beast wars, but yes, there were a great many much better shows... but also as a nerdy kid with only rabbit ears and a once every two weeks trip to the library, I watched whatever I could.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

God damn, there's way too many people in here disrespecting Gargoyles. I watched that on ABC, we didn't have those fancy rabbit eats. :)

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Yup, that's just the movie without the matte. Like all versions of the movie, it has the CGI scenes present. He said he has a version where those aren't there, or the scenes containing CGI are notably cropped compared to the others. I'd love to see that.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That's not just the movie without the matte. That's the exact version of the movie @olejellylegs@lemmy.zip was referring to, in which the all-practical scenes appear in an open-matte square frame while the scenes containing CGI are cropped and zoomed to widescreen. Scroll to exactly 20 minutes in and keep an eye on the screen size from cut to cut.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's the inverse of his description, though.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

No it isn't. Olejellylegs wrote, "the open matte version of the film where only digital shots are cropped". In this the open-matte scenes are uncropped (the editor hasn't yet removed the top and bottom of the frame to make a widescreen final shot) while the CGI scenes are cropped to widescreen (because they've been through the optical printing process to render the CGI back to film, and lost the extraneous top and bottom of the frame in that process.)

Especially back when this level of CGI was hugely expensive and laborious, when doing the digital FX shots they were only going to spend the time and money to render the widescreen area and they weren't bothering with the areas of the screen which would just get cropped off.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

From his description it sounded otherwise. Regardless, it doesn't change the fact that the CGI scenes in the movie look much better than the CGI in the OP's image. And again, this is a shit post. The point was never doing deep research into a topic and winning an argument on the internet. It was making stupid jokes.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You asked for the thing to be shared with you, and I gave you the link. 🫡