this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
343 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new Coddy Developer Survey found that four in five developers, 80%, say their use of AI has felt more like a dependence than an advantage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (6 children)

Ai coding is like the loom for society but you have to know how to use it.

People claiming its garbage slop are 2 years out of date on current models.

To all those people I suggest you familiarize yourself with it as whats coming is going to ruin the world but not because its slop because its going to be capable.

[–] thefloweracidic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

AI can handle boilerplate and any coding project that has been done ad nauseam. AI can't handle legacy system quirks, creative problem solving, or massive projects with changing requirements. I don't think the AI bubble will be around long enough for them to solve these shortcomings or the issues of expanding scope and scale leading to hallucinations.

To me AI is just impressive enough to convince managers and inexperienced developers it is the future. I'll believe that when a Fortune 500 company rebuilds their whole entire tech stack via AI, and I think AI could solve climate change before it could do that haha.

[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

I disagree with much of your ai cant deal with complexity.

I dunno i am just saying be prepared because its going to blind side everyone thinking its a fad

[–] thefloweracidic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Could you give some examples of AI handling complexity? From what I've read from senior developers is that the more scope AI has to chew on the more mistakes it makes. In terms of complexity I'm not talking about algorithms, differential calculus, or mind breaking recursion. I'm talking about the usual hodgepodge of monolithic microservices too many "Were a tech company that does X" companies have built over the past decade that are layered on top of software built before I was born.

Maybe I'm just creating too complex and specific use case, but my time as a software developer had me working through problems like that.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 1 points 28 minutes ago

AI can’t handle legacy system quirks, creative problem solving, or massive projects with changing requirements.

I think that disliking ai - for whatever good reason - makes people shun the reality, cherry-pick articles/studies etc, but we have to be honest: We all do that - even when we try to balance it, so that is normal behaviour within a spectrum. However, current anti-ai leaning do end up blinded to how fast things are moving with this technology because it is moving so fast. There are massive burnouts just from those following AI development every day, and they constantly have to expand/narrow their scope. If anyone takes a few days of in their field of interest, it feels like they have to sprint to catch up. It is accelerating and is no longer confined to model inventions from big corps with mega models - developers are building 'cognitive architectures' around the current llm' limitations.

So to me, these 'AI can't ...' type of sentences are always changing as they become yesterdays 'AI cant ...' sentences within days or weeks. It is a great 'moving goalpost' tho, as there are a lot of human level evolutionary abilities lacking from current models. But every second, one+ of millions of people are working towards adding that next 'AI cant ..' sentence to yesterdays claims, and things are moving fast.

I think it is vital for everyone - in all corners of human 'belief-space' - to keep in active touch with this technology, as much as they can muster, agree they are angry but try to shake some hard assumptions/'loosen up', see where it is headed and adjust their expectations/plans for the future accordingly. Anger is an easy but dangerous thing as it can make us refuse to acknowledge something that we need to prepare for. We've all been there - many many times, and we all know how we think and act in anger. Now, is a bad time for that. Please familiarise your self with ai tech.

Not starting an argument/debate (i'm burned out atmo), just a long-winded observation really..

load more comments (3 replies)