this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
363 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
87447 readers
3717 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think that disliking ai - for whatever good reason - makes people shun the reality, cherry-pick articles/studies etc, but we have to be honest: We all do that - even when we try to balance it, so that is normal behaviour within a spectrum. However, current anti-ai leaning do end up blinded to how fast things are moving with this technology because it is moving so fast. There are massive burnouts just from those following AI development every day, and they constantly have to expand/narrow their scope. If anyone takes a few days of in their field of interest, it feels like they have to sprint to catch up. It is accelerating and is no longer confined to model inventions from big corps with mega models - developers are building 'cognitive architectures' around the current llm' limitations.
So to me, these 'AI can't ...' type of sentences are always changing as they become yesterdays 'AI cant ...' sentences within days or weeks. It is a great 'moving goalpost' tho, as there are a lot of human level evolutionary abilities lacking from current models. But every second, one+ of millions of people are working towards adding that next 'AI cant ..' sentence to yesterdays claims, and things are moving fast.
I think it is vital for everyone - in all corners of human 'belief-space' - to keep in active touch with this technology, as much as they can muster, agree they are angry but try to shake some hard assumptions/'loosen up', see where it is headed and adjust their expectations/plans for the future accordingly. Anger is an easy but dangerous thing as it can make us refuse to acknowledge something that we need to prepare for. We've all been there - many many times, and we all know how we think and act in anger. Now, is a bad time for that. Please familiarise your self with ai tech.
Not starting an argument/debate (i'm burned out atmo), just a long-winded observation really..
Haha I feel the long winded observation, I get it. I'm open to being wrong about AI, but you missed the main point of my argument
Right now AI simply can't (or at least last time I checked because you're correct the technology moves very fast) do the things I mentioned.
These things, in my mind, are the gatekeepers for profitability if AI can figure these and any other issues and turn a profit before the bubble bursts, then yes we'd have an AI future. If we really get down to brass tacks (and now that I'm really thinking about it) that is the objective issue with AI, it isn't profitable yet, it doesn't matter if it can code a simulation of every life form on this planet if it isn't making money. If it can solve this problem however, then yes I'd agree, everyone saying "AI can't..." with eat their words seasoned with a little salt.
To address your accusation of cherry picking articles and advice for keeping in touch, I was kind of forced to cherry pick while attempting to keep in touch? When I was researching modern developments in AI all I was fed was an excessive amount of marketing material (this is a red flag for obvious reasons), I had to intentionally break good faith and search for things like "The issues with claude code" to get something written by a person who did not have a conflict of interest when it came to reviewing AI
I'd love to see examples of AI proving the naysayers wrong, but I was either seeing nothing but hype or enough evidence to remain skeptical of the technology.
What I'm trying to say is that I've tried to follow AI, I've tried to be impartial, but combined with what I am seeing, what I experienced as a software developer, and the economic side of AI, I don't see any sort of AI revolution akin to the printing press or the internet. Just another race to wealth fueled by hype and some very impressive math.
I do think that outside of coding AI has some really great promises, like being able to design an Excel spreadsheet in plain English is amazing for anyone afraid of Excel, so microsoft copilot has my respect within the M365 suite, granted I don't know what the Excel wizards have to say about the matter, but I think your average 9 to 5 desk worker whose experience with Excel revolved around accidentally opening it once would love copilot.