this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
215 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

87447 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 112 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents. RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 52 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Sure for RAM but holy shit why is not done for medicine?

[–] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 3 hours ago

It is. It's called Compulsory Licensing.

There is also an FDA Shortage list (most countries have a similar list).
A drug on that list gives the government additional powers to allow companies to work around the parents.

I think this is why there has been so many "off-brand" weight loss drugs recently. Novo Nordisk had supply chain issues with semaglutide, triggering governments to allow other manufacturers

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 28 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Because that would be something Jesus would approve of and we can't allow that

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 9 points 7 hours ago

Supply Side Jesus would approve.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 14 points 7 hours ago

The Gates Foundation had strong objections to releasing the covid-19 patents. I'm sure they had some sort of rationale that wasn't "this would set a bad precedent for M$ patents.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

OK, but the leak in the article seems to have been in 2016 when conditions were very different.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

So patents are stopping the whole market competition thing, like what how capitalism is supposed to work and all that.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.

It should never be an infinite source of money.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Patents in the US only last 20 years on stuff like this, the problem is that lawyers are crafty. So they will patent the formula and then 20 years later the delivery method or something like that. Thus preventing generics for longer than they should be able to.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

Seems like a good idea, but would probably just result in Hollywood accounting so that they never actually make any profit on paper.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 hours ago

Only way how capitalism works is that the rich are just becoming the richer by exploiting the poor(er).