this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
74 points (63.2% liked)

Memes

56744 readers
732 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27603744

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 0 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Egypt was never attempting to attack Israel

And it was never trying to help NATO amass their troops to attack Pissrael.
So, in short, you brought up a completely irrelevant event and keep refusing to answer the original question.

having a base doesn’t mean there will be an eminent attack.

Ah yes, the most prolific invader in the world, while being known for attacking after amassing troops for such attacks, is apparently not likely to do so in this particular case is what you are saying.

I believe in economical and diplomatic preasure until there is a real eminent threat

What "economical" and "diplomatic" pressure was Russia able to put on NATO without crippling itself?


Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state's border?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

the most prolific invader in the world is the terrorist state of Israel which also have good relation with Russia. It is relevant to say that both used the same excuse to invade . We all know that both consider the people they occupy fake and claim that the perspective identity of Palestinians and Ukrainians do not existing

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 0 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

the most prolific invader in the world is the terrorist state of Israel

Pissrael is de facto a part of NATO, and is controlled from Washington. So, in addition to Pissrael's Lebensraum, NATO is responsible for things like the invasions of Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, and many, many other places (at least some of them - multiple times since 1950).

which also have good relation with Russia.

And yet, Russia does have friendly relations with the Palestinian resistance, and NATO does not.

It is relevant to say that both used the same excuse to invade .

It's not.
You were asked a question about what a state should do when militarily threatened by the most prolific invader in the world, and, for some reason, brought up Egypt of all polities.

We all know that both consider the people they occupy fake and claim that the perspective identity of Palestinians and Ukrainians do not existing

Except, there has been 0 evidence of contemporary Russia conducting a genocide (either in this case, or before), unlike what NATO has been doing.


Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s border?

Also, it is quite silly how you excuse Ukraine's invasions of Iraq, Syria, and Iran.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Israel and Russia collaborated and had good relation by your logic Russia is also part of Nato

And yet, Russia does have friendly relations with the Palestinian resistance, and NATO does not.

Russia with trading with israel is generating money for israel to exterminate Palestinians . Russia backstabbed too much people , when it's veto is important they do not use it. They did not vote against trump "surrender" plan , they did not vote against the nato intervention in Libya

In 2006, Israeli troops found evidence of Russian made Kornet-E and Metis-M anti-tank systems in Hezbollah's possession in southern Lebanon. In 2007, in response to accusations that it was supplying terrorist groups with weapons, Russia said it was conducting inspections of Syrian weapons storage facilities to prevent the weapons from reaching unintended customers.

Except, there has been 0 evidence of contemporary Russia conducting a genocide (either in this case, or before), unlike what NATO has been doing.

because Russia consider Ukrainians Russians they do not plan to exterminate Ukrainians but to erase Ukraine cultural specificities

Also, it is quite silly how you excuse Ukraine’s invasions of Iraq, Syria, and Iran.

I do not excuse Ukraine invasion of Iraq . I do not shy away to condemn ukraine for supporting israel and the war on Iran.

You know that Israel, Russian and the usa are bullshitting when they keep switching the excuse. Decide yourself you invaded Ukraine because of nato, because it host nazis or because you believe ukraine is a fake state and should be russian