this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

77902 readers
3027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

See title - very frustrating. There is no way to continue to use the TV without agreeing to the terms. I couldn't use different inputs, or even go to settings from the home screen and disconnect from the internet to disable their services. If I don't agree to their terms, then I don't get access to their new products. That sucks, but fine - I don't use their services except for the TV itself, and honestly, I'd rather by a dumb TV with a streaming box anyway, but I can't find those anymore.

Anyway, the new terms are about waiving your right to a class action lawsuit. It's weird to me because I'd never considered filing a class action lawsuit against Roku until this. They shouldn't be able to hold my physical device hostage until I agree to new terms that I didn't agree at the time of purchase or initial setup.

I wish Roku TVs weren't cheap walmart brand sh*t. Someone with some actual money might sue them and sort this out...

EDIT: Shout out to @testfactor@lemmy.world for recommending the brand "Sceptre" when buying my next (dumb) TV.

EDIT2: Shout out to @0110010001100010@lemmy.world for recommending LG smart TVs as a dumb-TV stand in. They apparently do require an agreement at startup, which is certainly NOT ideal, but the setup can be completed without an internet connection and it remembers input selection on powerup. So, once you have it setup, you're good to rock and roll.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Report Roku to the FBI for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by hacking into and sabotaging your property.

That's a sincere suggestion, by the way. This shit should literally be a crime.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't do this. This just creates more work for the FBI and you know that report is going straight into the rubbish bin. That is just wasting public resources.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

you know that report is going straight into the rubbish bin.

In that case, you should additionally complain to your Congressperson that the FBI isn't doing their goddamn job.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Piss off. You're not even an American. Don't tell us what to do with our FBI.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Imposter! No Murcan would use "rubbish bin".

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, that would definitely not go anywhere. Roku isn't hacking into their device. OP probably bought a Roku Smart TV for like $75 (the cost is subsidized by Roku, hence why it's so cheap) and is now complaining about it. It's like buying an Amazon FireTV and then complaining about Amazon having control over the TV.

Edit: am I saying it's right? No, but sometimes it pays to read the EULA. If you're getting something for cheap, there's probably a reason for it.