this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
211 points (71.3% liked)

Memes

56829 readers
434 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
211
"You dont Understand, you have to support the lesser evil" (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 days ago by Salamence@mander.xyz to c/memes@lemmy.ml
332 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/9388376

Tweto by https://x.com/gaijingirl2026/status/2092235861265924137

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Which does not include any concrete difference in policy

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah funny, i wonder why that is

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

Right, that's what I'm saying. The point the meme is making is that there is no policy difference. You're disagreeing with the other guy's interpretation here, not mine.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How detailed does a meme have to be?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The entire point of the meme is that both options do the same exact thing while acting differently to the public eye. If the meme intended to show a difference in policy or behavior it would have. That is the core of the argument being made, not an irrelevant detail.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I disagree but I don't think anyone will accept that my interpretation of the meme is correct because I didn't make it. So I made a different one where I can say with authority what the intent is.

Does this avoid the flaws you see here?