this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
467 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

87624 readers
3945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me too, but my library must not be nearly as impressive.

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some of the more high quality 4k releases (even 1080p ones) just gobbles up storage. I had to settle for the more optimized releases since I just have a 8tb external drive. Wanted to build a nas but man they are expensive, both a good nas and even the basic hard disks. Can't wait for the bubble to pop.

[–] wool0698@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

If you're not wanting Remux Rips I'd really suggest converting your files to H.265, it's got much better compression ratios than H.264. You can set up tdarr or fileflows (fileflows is much easier if you don't want to write the ffmpeg yourself) to run through your library and automatically run conversions on new files. I use it to also strip foreign language tracks from files where it's neither the primary track nor original language

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Some of the more high quality 4k releases (even 1080p ones) just gobbles up storage.

I'm scratching my head here. Are they just being sloppy and inconsiderate?

The biggest video file I have is a fan edit of the hobbit trilogy. It's 4 hours of 720p at 8 gigabytes. Why?

I'm just starting to experiment with Jellyfin, and I'm considering shrinking that down. I'm good with whatever format fit 90 minutes onto a 700MB video file that could be burned to a CD.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Raw bluray rips can easily be over 100GB. I tried for a minute before I decided 1080p was sufficient.

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 8 points 22 hours ago

Compression will almost always compromises on quality. You can often notice the artifacts on scenes with lot of moving particles and such. So if you can afford the extra storage then that would definitely be the better option. At what stage do you consider them good enough is a very personal choice and the difference in quality often diminishes a lot as you go up. If you are happy with smaller releases then that's perfectly fine too.