this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
336 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

87680 readers
2774 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yet no one wants to leave social media.

I left it last year and feel so much better. No FB no Whatsapp, no Insta, no Tictok, no nothing.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] koka_noodles@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Is this social?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This comment is not the slam dunk you think it is... Lemmy isn't owned by corp interests, it's not algorithm driven and it isn't 92% bots from fascists, oligarchs and foreign influence agencies. You can as much control as you want here. You can talk to actual people here.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world -3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Everyone has an agenda. Lemmy wasn’t created for shits and giggles. You don’t really know what’s under the hood, what posts and comments are encouraged, which ones have votes that are inflated. It’s an illusion to think otherwise.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I'm sorry to see comments like this mindlessly downvoted. While I don't agree that Lemmy was built with any ill intentions, this thread results in good discourse.

For example, the platform itself lends itself to be used or abused to promote commercial interests or push one side of a story. The manner in which pro-Russian content has flooded Lemmy shows how the platform itself can be used to manipulate narratives, and there are no doubt many more subtle ways in which the community sentiment is being skewed in ways we might not realize.

[–] x7HlPDq9dSNO6v3A9@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I'm missing something here, but isn't knowing what's under the hood exactly the point of projects like Lemmy? The source is available on github, and they explain the algorithms or talk about their political bias pretty openly in most communities.

Were you thinking more from the angle of the way our social biases work as a group, or like the risk of maintainers tampering with the sauce pre-release?

I hope this didn't come across shitty - genuinely curious.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 13 hours ago

If open forums on the internet don't have some filtering / steering they all too easily degenerate into YouTube comment sections, or worse. Lemmy seems to mostly be administered with a light touch, but I believe it - even more than Reddit - is sub-moderator driven in terms of what gets removed, what gets allowed.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 13 hours ago

You can join the Lemmy / ActivityPub developers' meetings via video chat anytime you like. I'm not "into" that level of things but I dropped in a few times just to see what's up - there's a definite axe or two they're grinding, not that they're bad people or out to hurt others at all, but if you don't detect some agenda basis from that crew, you need to think a layer deeper about what those people have been through and why they're doing something to make the world a better place in the future.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does lemmy do the whole algorithm thing? I don't think so, but I could be wrong.

Algorithmic social media is pretty much what we're talking about, I'm sure.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Of course it has an algorithm, but I think you're referring to an algorithm that includes personalized or demographic parameters.

Regardless of whether the algorithm includes that (or rather, to which degree), let's not forget that bad actors can use the knowledge of the open source algorithm to identify the optimal way to manipulate the platform to bring their content on top.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

You are not wrong. It is a social media and TBF the term has been poisoned by many platforms. I think just like drinks there are healthier options. Healthier online community spaces and I’d like to think this place is one of them.

It is an addiction that takes steps of lesser. The place you visit. How long you stay there are steps of management.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] faizanyay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

sm = social media

[–] wedge@multiverse.soulism.net -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Lacks self-awareness, along with everyone upvoting them lol.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Self awareness is very challenging, you will always have blind spots.

[–] wedge@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, and… it’s a skill that needs to be practiced. We don’t call it out as a skill, we don’t recognize it as a skill, and we don’t tell others that they need to practice it. So we get stupid shit like people saying they don’t do social media, on social media.

The world would be a much better place if we prioritized self-awareness as a universal skill.

[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There are lots of us that wanted to leave and did. There are lots that want to and can’t find the will power to do so. It’s definitely addictive. It was hard for me to quit, I have an addictive personality, but I’ve also given up drinking and smoking entirely without councilors or pharma aids. I think it’s time we regulate it like a dangerous addiction until there’s a change to how the algorithms function, which may be never.