this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
572 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

48792 readers
310 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why do you assume that Microsoft doesn't want to comply?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Expense of getting and staying compliant.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 days ago

If they didn't want it, they would have lobbied against it.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that is a problem for Microsoft, especially because they would want your ID and age, tracking you as much as possible already. Also you don't just change the Kernel just like that, there are licenses attached, drivers and other stuff. From technical point of view, in current implementation it is probably impossible. Let alone Microsoft would face issues with compatibility. If we put the technical difficulties aside, I don't even think Microsoft is against this law and pretty much wants it.

[–] fdagpigj@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

They could just change the license of their codebase, if that's what they wanted to do. No way in hell they care about users enough though, and probably most windows users still don't care enough even about this to jump ship.

[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

What expense? Adding one more thing to track about you, especially something they already know and essentially just need to verify, cannot be that expensive.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

To be weighed against the profits from having all that new data on user identities.