this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
484 points (91.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47381 readers
1958 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gallery image 2

Gallery image 3

Gallery image 4

Gallery image 5

Gallery image 6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone -5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

not a strawman. literally every role in the military is involved in the murder of children. every. single. role.

[–] skidicarus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And what about roles outside of the military? When was the last time you contributed to slavery or child exploitation with your purchases? How about your employer?

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 minutes ago

You are equating purchasing things with directly participating in the most vile military on the planet.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

two things can be true at once.

[–] skidicarus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Just wanted to make sure since people in this thread seem to be taking a holier-than-thou stance. As above:

Would it be okay, then, for me to rob, torture, and kill your family if it was the only way for me to get higher education (i.e. something that is not necessary to live)? What about the families these monsters kill that won't be able to receive higher education on account of being dead or kidnapped?

If we're talking about more than just service members who directly engage in combat and are including non-combat roles (cook, mail clerk), then the answer has to be yes.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

the cook is just as guilty as the sniper, yes. i agree.

[–] skidicarus@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Which makes you also as guilty as the cook. Unless, of course, you live off the grid, homestead, and are entirely self-sufficient.

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 minutes ago

There is a massive difference between cooking meals for schoolchildren and making sure that military personnel can function to achieve their objectives of subjugating non-white people.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

my industry - firefighting and software engineering for healthcare is, particularly quite different than being a part of an organization that has a monopoly on violence. additionally, that same org has me living under capitalism, from birth. so try again with your reductio.

the adults who volunteer to join that violent organization are certainly much more guilty than others who choose not to join.

your attempt at this false equivalency is just trollish and serves to show exactly how much you enjoy the taste of uncle sam’s boot.

[–] skidicarus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And what of the firefighters and software engineers (and healthcare professionals) who just so happen to be doing those things in the military? You doing them in the civilian sector is somehow a morally superior choice? You as a firefighter are quite literally in the business of protecting the property of capitalists. You are just as much a protector of capitalism and the capitalist class as any person in the military. I'm not going to assume you're an American, but needless to say your involvement in the healthcare industry is arguably just as problematic as military service if you are.

That doesn't even get into your consumption habits. Do you consume animals products? How about products that are constructed with exploited labor, even slaves? Child labor? How about the products you consume that are irresponsibly produced from an environmental perspective?

But, hey, I'm glad you're able to live with the choices you've made. We all must. It's just a shame that you've deluded yourself into thinking you're somehow more innocent than others based on those same flawed choices.

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 minutes ago

And what of the firefighters and software engineers (and healthcare professionals) who just so happen to be doing those things in the military?

They are contributing to military tasks the goal of which is subjugation of non-white people. Programming avionics so that planes can bomb Iran, fighting fires on carriers, etc. is unambiguously evil.

You doing them in the civilian sector is somehow a morally superior choice?

If we exclude doing such things for NATO military and espionage organisations, then it almost always is, yes.

You are just as much a protector of capitalism and the capitalist class as any person in the military

Lol no. If you can't see the difference between stopping fires from killing civilians or destroying buildings/non-military equipment, and directly contributing to things like subjugating Iran or defending invaders of Iraq and Iran from retaliation, you need to go to primary school or something.

your involvement in the healthcare industry is arguably just as problematic as military service if you are.

How so?

Do you consume animals products?

This is probably the closest you have made to a compelling point. However, in this case you would have to attack the people involved in meat production first, rather than people who merely consume those products.

Same goes for the other points in that paragraph.
Also, you do have to contend with the fact that those people were enslaved because of NATO's military.

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Why "strawman"? They are literally saying that that is perfectly okay to do for USians against people elsewhere. Why can't you also say how it would be so good if you were on the receiving end of this poverty-alleviating programme?

Also, again, what about the poverty and education of the families these soldiers kidnap, torture, and kill?