this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
50 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

87680 readers
3576 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The thing is, Apple was the exception in terms of the “AI” circlejerkery. Not trying to fanboi for them - simply pointing out that they are nowhere near the proportional outlay that the kool-aid drinkers are, in terms of ML spend.

[–] capital5@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's probably about to change with their new CEO too:

"It's becoming clear that AI is not a fad, is not something that will go away in the next two or three years," said Jeronimo. "It's something that will dictate the future of most tech companies and indeed all companies."

He reckons AI could be "the most consequential technology" for Apple because it could either help it maintain its lofty position or create a set of daunting challenges.

https://www.dw.com/en/can-new-apple-ceo-john-ternus-fix-the-tech-giants-ai-woes/a-78575898

It's pretty likely that AI was the reason why Apple is changing CEOs in the first place, because they have been getting criticized for not being as hopelessly stupid about it as other tech companies are.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Nah, I don’t think that’s it. Cook is 65, and retirement (or semi-retirement) is appropriate for his age.

Termus is a hardware guy, and if AI is going to play a part in Apple’s long-term plan (and I agree that it will,) it’s going to skew heavily on-device. I don’t think we see any big AI changes from Apple just because Ternus is now CEO.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

Also, Apple was kinda dull under Cook.

Which is a weird thing to say when you have big swings like the Vision Pro. But the phones pads and watches really played it safe.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 54 minutes ago

Totally agree and why I’m cautiously optimistic about Ternus.

[–] capital5@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago

Fair, he was due to retire.

But at the very least, there's a good chance that Apple will start trying to ~~shoehorn~~ integrate AI in a lot of places. How much and where remains to be seen. Especially as a new CEO, there will be a lot of pressure to respond to all the criticism they've been receiving about their approach to AI.