this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
31 points (89.7% liked)
Asklemmy
55544 readers
792 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Even sugar-free drinks are suspected to increase your chance of diabetes, obesity, and a wide variety of other health issues. High consumption of artifically sweetened beverages are suspected to increase your likelihood of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer, notably a large increase in cholecystectomies, which you say you've had.
Here's a long review of smaller-scale studies of a variety of associations and/or suspected causations of diet soda consumption - Notably arterial disease and "remodelling", Weight gain, Depression in later life, Eating disorders, impaired cognitive development, hip fractures, UTIs, Diabetic retinopathy, End-stage renal disease, Leukemia and lymphoma, and overall mortality. The review concluded that by objective standards, the included studies were all at least of "moderate" quality.
Need I go on?
Is a lot of that going to be correlative? For sure yeah. Is it still maybe a very good idea to incorporate more water into your diet? Also yeah.
Thanks for the links. I'll give them a read through.
They didn't separate artificial sweetened beverages from those with sugar in the article about gallbladder cancer. That's sort of... important from my perspective. Cancer and gallstones are different things anyway. I'm confidant my issues were with malnutrition over my gallbladder and the problematic gallstones.
Likewise, obese people consume "diet" sodas in an attempt to diet. Even in that review it has garbage conclusions like "consumption of any type of soda". Yea, that's real helpful in figuring out if aspartame is a carcinogen--let's sample people who don't drink aspartame exclusively to collect two data-sets: those that drink water exclusively and those that drink sugar-soda exclusively. That says nothing about aspartame.
A lot of this is garbage. I hate meta-reviews. They're always garbage.
Like, I've already stated I'm not obese, yet people keep bringing up obesity and sugar-related diseases. Thanks for not reading.
To be honest, your responses read like someone who's already decided that it's not an issue. These studies definitely have flaws and limitations, I admitted that - But across the board, even those that take efforts to control for confounding factors like obesity and sugar in various ways, these issues are reported as above.
These are the facts as we know them. Do with it as you like, it's your life, but I would definitely argue the data at least means it'll likely cause issues and likely already has. Don't randomly accuse me of not reading because we disagree on interpretations.