this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
60 points (68.5% liked)

Today I Learned

31525 readers
98 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And the author of this article is tying himself into a pretzel trying to absolve Tolkien of this great shame.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is why we say such things as "We must separate the art from the artist." Some of us pay to see Tom Cruise movies, some of us can't stand to see his face. There are still plenty of fans of Harry Potter, but they can't so much as mention it without being shouted down, these days.

They're all human, unless they're AI. So, we're going to disagree with them on some, or many, or all things, aside from their art. There are extremely few Dolly Partons and Fred Rogers in the world. You can accept this, or you can cancel everyone but the pure, and then decide amongst them who is the most pure, and only ever listen to Dolly Parton songs.

Go ahead and keep screaming about this, but I'm done with it. I like the art I like, that doesn't mean I like the artist. Deal with it.

[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think we can pretty easily separate the idea of continuing to give money to someone who is one of the most active breeders of hate against transgender individuals as bad from the enjoyment of the work of a long dead author who supported horrible causes.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does it have cancer yet? Any hope it will die soon?

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It doesn't look good but that's probably Ozempic.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It depends on your tolerance for how bad that person is and how much you want to contribute to their financial well being. For JK Rowling, my opinion is that if JK just said she doesn't like trans people, I'd disagree, but that by itself may not be a reason to not enjoy the work produced by her. However, she actively fights to put down trans people and spreads transphobia. That is reason enough for me to never do anything that will finance her and therefore support her actions.

In this case, Tolkein is long dead. Nothing I do now will contribute to him further pushing and supporting fascism.

Everyone gets to make this choice on their own. Nobody said you're not allowed to enjoy that art. If you decide that you're fine supporting artists through thick or thin and there's no line they can cross that will turn you away, then you can't be surprised or upset when other people change their opinion of you as a person. If you're okay with that, then that's fine, it's your life, live it.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah. Hitler was a painter, too.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And, a good one. Thank you, this makes my point perfectly. I don't support what he did*. But, I can appreciate his art. He wasn't doing paint-by-numbers, he was actually good, at least technically. Maybe more of an illustrator than Artiste.

*I can't say "obviously" here, because there are far too many who still do. But, I'm certainly not one of them. Again, making my point.

To expand on this a bit, if there were an art gallery showing of a large collection of Hitler's works, I'd pay $20 to see it, mostly out of curiosity. Then, in this hypothetical scenario, I'd join the protest outside against Hitler.

My son is an adult now, but if I had a young child who wanted to read Harry Potter for the first time, I'd buy them the books. I'd be thrilled they wanted to read such long books, and encourage them to do it. I would not deny them, and lecture them about what a piece of shit the author is.

I don't like Tom Cruise's movies, except for Risky Business. If my kid wanted to watch Mission Impossible movies, I'd pirate the movies for them.

Nah, man. Maybe you should rethink your position.

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surprised you’re not on reddit

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Low effort comment. Insult is generic and easily applicable; little skill demonstrated. 2/5.

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This is why we say such things as “We must separate the art from the artist.”

Do we? Everyone has to decide that for themselves, everyone draws the crooked line somewhere else.

[–] ati@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I used to think that but then I read about Eric Gill's crimes (Gill Sans font) and now I can't look at it. Don't look it up, by the way.