this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2026
371 points (96.0% liked)

Selfhosted

62087 readers
258 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Time to find a new VPS host.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I dont like Omarcy and DHH but its pretty obvious why hes getting the funding and not other projects. The reason this gets funded and stuff like Gnome and KDE doesnt is because DHH has influence, he isnt a foss purist and he has no bureaucracy holding him back.

No one cares when KDE makes a post trying to drive linux adoption. When DHH does it drives thousands of new linux users. DHH alone can market the distro to new people in a way most foss projects cant.

When a company tries to partner with another project not only do they get very little exposure because the community is small and resistant to advertising but they also often get attacked and purity tested by the users and it generates bad press. When DHH partners with a company his users think its cool and try out the product. It doesnt matter how scummy the company is or if its closed source subscription only.

Investors also see Omachy as something where changes can be made without needing 4 years of arguing with one guy rejecting every change. A fast moving tech focused platform with a good marketer could pull people out of the microsoft apple ecosystem to a place where products can freely compete without entrenched platforms stealing their idea and making their version the default

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What if we like Linux stuff because it is hard for corporations to feel good in there

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Thats fine. We just ignore Omarcy and hold our upstream projects to account if they start trying to implement omacy features.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago

It's because he has no real ideals and broken morals

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago

Why does this remind me of the common argument made against democracy and for e.g. China… "it moves fast, less resistance, faster results"…

And yet it's still worse.

The whole argument doesn't hold up either. Your company - or the people behind it, if it's new - just can't be known as the usual profit-driven asshole. I mean, look at how the relations between the Community and Valve is. Nobody would argue Valve being perfect, but they're known not to be the usual assholes and thereby cautiously welcome.

If you or your company can't deal with society being vigilant (especially in capitalism) then they've no place in said society. This vigilance is the only reason Linux still feels made for the user(advanced ones, but still). Fuck anyone who wants to destroy that with means of accelerationism and alike.

DHH and Omarchy are just cultural cancer. What you correctly described is basically one aspect of how unfettered capitalism manipulates people and destroys healthy communities for the sake of growth.

yes but investors and private equity are cancer